I have read the draft and I support most of the ideas. However, is publishing this as a separate RFC that updates RFC 6125 by patching it the best way forward? I think it would be much better to rewrite RFC 6125 with all the patches applied, and then have that new document obsolete RFC 6125 instead of updating it.
Cheers, Brian On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 7:47 AM Valery Smyslov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > > > this message starts 2 weeks formal adoption call for draft-rsalz-use-san. > > The call will end on Sunday 28 March. > > > > The draft has already received some support for adoption, of course it'll > be counted. > > > > Regards, > > Valery (for the chairs). > > > _______________________________________________ > Uta mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta > -- https://briansmith.org/
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
