*   I believe the “obsoleting” path is a better choice here. In general, the 
“Updates” field can be interpreted in different ways, while “Obsoletes” is 
straightforward. In addition, 6125 does not have other documents updating it, 
so that information would not be lost by obsoleting it. Just be mindful of the 
risk of re-discussing old points not in scope of the current I-D, as Michael 
says.

So a full replacement.  Apply the current draft as a patch and post the result 
as the new version. :)  Ok.

_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta

Reply via email to