Hi Nimrod, > Nimrod Aviram <[email protected]> wrote: > > I understand you're going with non-ephemeral finite-field > Diffie-Hellman as a SHOULD NOT? > Could you please elaborate on your reasons for this decision?
I would expect that raising the normative bar to MUST NOT should come in a document with TLS WG consensus -- e.g., draft-bartle/draft-aviram. In the meantime, what we can do from the UTA/BCP point of view is sticking a strong warning label on it. cheers, t -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
