On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 10:38 PM Martin Thomson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022, at 15:25, Rob Sayre wrote: > > It meant: "go ahead and publish this document, it will only damage your > > credibility and the IETF's" > > Now where have I heard that statement before? Strangely the response I'd > have is the same in both cases. > > If we're guessing about outcomes, I'd say that publishing this document is > unlikely to damage anyone's reputation. It's useful, pragmatic guidance. > > On the other hand, deciding not to publish it because someone complained > would do a lot more damage to the credibility of the institution. That > would make the institution appear out of touch, and weak enough that a bit > of modest disagreement causes it to fear doing something useful. > Sure, mandate TLS 1.2 support. That seems like a really good idea. thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
