I think you are referring to this diff: https://github.com/richsalz/draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis/pull/84/files
My feedback would be to rewrite all uses of "e.g." and the associated parentheticals. Follow-up sentences will do. Then, I would match any mention of "web browsers" with examples of implementations that do things another way. I suspect this approach might make for difficult writing, because I don't think anyone diverges from the browser approach. If I'm wrong here, I'd be happy to see it documented. thanks, Rob On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 6:58 PM Peter Saint-Andre <stpe...@stpeter.im> wrote: > Oh, it appears that we neglected to merge a pull request before pushing > out the new version. My fault. > > On 1/24/23 6:42 PM, Rob Sayre wrote: > > Hi, > > > > It looks like the -09 revision of the draft added XSS advice, only > > applicable to browsers, but still doesn't mention the WHATWG work in > > internationalized domain names, which is what browsers actually use. Are > > the parts of what the draft references as IDNA-DEFS and IDNA-PROTO fully > > overlapping with the WHATWG work? I can't actually tell, and I would > > look to this document to inform me. > > > > thanks, > > Rob > > > >
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
