I'm in favor of adoption of this draft. While it has plenty of nits and needs
other work, the general concept is a good one and should be pursued. While I
can see reasons for this draft to be Informational, I'm not sure that will be
helpful to the normative language used in the draft.
-Peter
On 4/4/24, 6:20 AM, "Uta on behalf of Valery Smyslov" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi,
at the last IETF meeting there was some interest in adoption of
draft-rsalz-uta-require-tls13 in UTA WG.
This message starts a 2-week adoption call for
draft-rsalz-uta-require-tls13-01, that will end on Thursday,18 April 2024.
Please, send your opinions on the list by this date. Please also indicate
whether you are ready to review / contribute.
Regards,
Alan & Valery.
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
