Hi Chris, thanks very much for the review!
re: PQC. Please see the refurbished Section 20 [1]. For the rationale behind the changes see also our answer to Roman's COMMENT.
[1] https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-uta-tls13-iot-profile-24.html#section-20
cheers! On 06.08.2026 05:36, Christopher Inacio via Datatracker wrote:
Christopher Inacio has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-uta-tls13-iot-profile-23: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-tls13-iot-profile/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I will echo that PQC algorithms are available for this document. And additional advice from PQUIP is almost ready for balloting on considerations for running those algorithms on constrained devices.
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
