From: Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:31:56 -0700 (PDT)
> > means sparc ends up allocating 38 * sizeof(u32) * sizeof(u32), and > > sparc64 ends up with 36 * sizeof(u64) * sizeof(u64), which must surely > > be wrong? > > Yup! Sure looks like Dave skipped the step where it says "test that core > dumps work ... and produce correct results". :-) It was allocating too much memory, which is harmless. So it did work, and I did test it.
