On 09/23, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > However, the current behaviour is that PTRACE_SINGLESTEP acts like > > PTRACE_SYSCALL (but see below), if the tracee is not going to return > > to user-mode yet. Say, PTRACE_EVENT_VFORK. > > Not really. Given what I just wrote, I'm not sure if you want me > to merge these. I'm sure you'll be changing it entirely and these > look to me to be enough in the wrong direction that they are not > incrementally useful.
Yes. these changes are temporary hacks. I did them mostly to ensure I really understand the pending problems. > My utrace tree is still forked from 2.6.31. If you want me to merge the > current upstream tree so you get b60e714d folded in, I can do that. I don't care ;) Because currently I do not pull from your tree. And I already applied b60e714d to my tree. Oleg.
