Hi - On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 07:28:34AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > [...] > > On the other hand, having ptrace/utrace in the -next tree will give it a > > lot more testing, while any outstanding technical issues are being > > addressed. > > Including experimental code that is RFC and which is not certain to go > upstream is certainly not the purpose of linux-next though. > [...]
Ingo, you are mistaken. The utrace core and utrace/ptrace code were submitted and reviewed together on lkml, and are not considered experimental. I know the names may be confusing, but it is unnecessary to bring up uprobes and other RFC/experimental items. None of these are included in the branch I pointed sfr to. - FChE
