Which is better to use for the general case in socket I/O? sendmsg/recvmsg or send/recv? I am using sendmsg/recvmsg to pass file descriptors across processes, but that is the only way to do it. I'm asking about the general case when the processes just want to talk to each other rather than pass file descriptors. Anyone have any good reasons for using sendmsg/recvmsg instead of send/recv? Thanks, Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the BYU UUG discussion mailist list, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" as the message body
