On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 06:35:33PM -0700, Stuart Jansen wrote: > On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 14:58, Danelle "Sylvia" Brown wrote: > > I agree with Jake. There is no need for a name change. Plus, I think the > > longer the name, the more intimidating and annoying it becomes. Three is a > > great number of letters (number of letters?) for a club. Five is right out. > > Keep UUG as it is, and educate public about what the name means, and about > > the revolution going on. It's all about Open Source, down with M$!!! > > And the counting of your name shall be three, and three shall be the > counting of your name. Two is too short, and four is too long, five is > right out, for three shall be the counting of your name. > -- The Book of Stuart, 5:14
Okay, maybe I'm going to change my mind about he whole name change
thing in order to make it look like we're not a bunch of whacko's. I
have just come to realize that we really *are* a bunch of whacko's. To
change our name may be a blatant case of false advertising. People who
join this list should not expect any form of mainstream thought or
normalcy. <sigh>
Mike
P.S. - I still think that if we were the Linux Users Group, we would
get more publicity and more members, but they may be in for a weird
experience once they join up. Maybe we can assimilate them. :-)
--
---------------------------------------- | ------------------------
Michael Halcrow | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet Security Research Lab | Dept. of Comp. Science
| Brigham Young University
Fight mandatory .signature truncation! |
Call |
---------------------------------------- | ------------------------
GnuPG Keyprint: 05B5 08A8 713A 64C1 D35D 2371 2D3C FDDA 3EB6 601D
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
