On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 10:33, Devin Pratt wrote:
Are Firebird and Thunderbird just as stable and compatible with websites as Mozilla is? If we want to make a good impression, give them the best. They won't care how fast it loads or that it doesn't need to install if it just plain doesn't work. However, I've only tried Firebird and that was a while ago.
I almost agree with the vote to leave off mozilla and just stick on Firebird and Thunderbird. They are both extremely stable. The only show stopper would be that a lot of windows plugin installers don't know to look for firebird. Java 1.4.2 is one of them. Except for that small problem, firebird is the browser of choice.
No, the show goes on. Firebird knows how to find Java, Java doesn't have to find it (Mozilla does too, of course). In fact the only major plugin I've used that still needs to actually be in the plugins folder is Flash, and that has an option to manually choose the folder.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
