Thanks, but switching to Postgres would be more of a pain than just using these queries the way they are :-) Dan
(All told I think I've burned about 50 hours on this little problem, what with all the help I've asked for from other people.) > Well, nuts. You got me really curious but after hacking at it for a few > hours tonight I still couldn't come up with anything. Oh sure, I found 2 > or 3 ways that involved subqueries. Of course, I don't profess to be the > best at outer joins. They scare me a little and I usually get them > backwards (left vs right) before I finally end up with the correct > query. > > The queries did work flawlessly under Postgres so you might consider > switching if it bugs you enough. > > Corey ____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
