On Friday 23 January 2004 17:07, Jacob Fugal wrote: > True :) But what if the material in the mistakenly broadcast email was > sensitive in some other way? It's the risk of accidental dissemination > of sensitive material vs. accidental restriction of audience. The latter > is easy to correct, the former nigh impossible.
Why are you sending information in plain text? Why are you discussing something that important, specifically in reply to part of a group discussion? > Not possible. Trust me. :) Not a chance... So another point, to me, replying to the user is much like being in a group discussion, then part of the group just walks away, still talking. Or 'closes the circle'. Not exactly friendly, or open. -- -- Jayce^
pgp00000.pgp
Description: signature
____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
