On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 08:20:20PM -0600, Michael Halcrow wrote: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:18:43PM -0700, Phillip Hellewell wrote: > > <tinfoil hat> > > > > Hmmmm, come to think of it, how can we trust this so called e-mail and > > so called break of SHA-1. I mean, hey, they didn't even really prove it > > yet, so how do we know it's not just some huge conspiracy; hey, maybe > > someone is trying to impersonate Michael and ruin his good name by > > spreading these nasty rumors!! Since there's no signature, we don't > > really know _WHO_ sent that message!!! > > > > </tinfoil hat> > > I certify that the previously sent messages with SHA-1 hashes for the > bodies: > > ce57b00152bc4d28fb6d1db7c0942d234d7061c5 > 21d6067691cc57fd69682adc946576cac6f653a7 > 342abccf1e67c06f89760f0f719fd75221e87b62 > > Were sent by me. You can take your tinfoil hat off now. ;-P
AGH. I forgot how to use mutt without the auto-sign flag. I certify that this message, with MD5 sum: 7ea2ed091f6dfbded6ef999ffd56f6bc Was sent by me. :-) Mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-------------------- BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
