-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Michael Torrie wrote:
> Brandon Stout wrote: > >> Except... I can do the same thing with top posting and say that it's >> another reason that bottom posting is problematic. >> > > What can you do? What is problematic? Without the context, it's hard > to know what you are referring to. That's actually my point. Someone trimmed the top off of a top post and said that since it lost the context, that's why top posting was bad. Then I trimmed the bottom post off, losing the context again, and top posted that that was why bottom posting is bad. I was only saying that the reason given for top posting being bad wasn't a good one since the person who said it created the problem himself, and I could duplicate the same problem for top posting. Brandon Stout Stout Hosting LLC -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkj2LH0ACgkQx0pgn74qrcKxBgCeJqN7pDpIQSX5meJ4sxuwzy8I JjQAn0u66UAQ6xGXhPp+9XlS9hfQ/Kto =A0ny -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -------------------- BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
