On 04/20/2010 09:40 PM, Michael G. H. Larsen wrote:
On 04/20/2010 07:04 PM, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Michael Larsen
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Quick, yes, but not intelligible). Of course, if you're on the wrong
system (ahem, *OSX*), it's misspelled as "pico" ;-).
10.6 has nano (not just a symlink to pico), and I'm pretty sure 10.5
was the same way.
That's good that they're finally moving up in the world... the last
OSX I used way 10.4, which, IIRC, was still using pico.
I predict that in 10 years this discussion will be filled with comments
about how nano is a great operating system, if they could just do
something about that editor...
;-Daniel Fussell
--------------------
BYU Unix Users Group
http://uug.byu.edu/
The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their
author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG.
___________________________________________________________________
List Info (unsubscribe here): http://uug.byu.edu/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
