Hi Roberto,

On 20.04.2011 13:09, Roberto De Ioris wrote:
> Hi all, as someone already noted uWSGI 0.9.8 development cycle has beed 
> started.
> 
> This will be the next LTS release so do not expect extremely big changes.
> 
> Currently we are focusing on fixing the various long-time quirks (as the 
> wsgi.input/rack.input total mess) and in allowing uWSGI to natively
> speaks other protocols (http, fastcgi and mongrel2/zeromq are already 
> available in the tip).
> 
> So, if you want to propose some new feature do it ASAP :)

  I'd like to ask once again for several improvements in Emperor mode:
    1. passing some options to instances with possibility of templating
in option value
    2. hooks for phases of starting/stopping instances (namely:
pre-start, post-start, pre-stop, post-stop).

  They are described more detaily in message [1]

  I understand that passing VASSAL_* environment variables from emperor
to vassals is the reasonable (and already implemented) solution for
issue 1, but for the sake of uniformity and transparentness passing
options of form --vassal-* from emperor to vassals would be great too.

  Autoloading of programming language bridge plugins: python, lua, psgi,
etc. (without explicit listing in '--plugins' option) is the another
feature that I'd like to see in uWSGI.

[1] http://lists.unbit.it/pipermail/uwsgi/2011-January/001241.html
_______________________________________________
uWSGI mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi

Reply via email to