> Hi, > > I think ticket 20 (http://projects.unbit.it/uwsgi/ticket/20) was > forgotten, > I wanted to know if someone else on the list would find it useful and if > Roberto thinks there's any chance it will make it by 1.0. > > Briefly, ticket #20 suggested that the workers dictionary in > uwsgi.status() > will contain the state (idle/busy/...?) of all workers. > >
Hi, tracking worker status is the basis to what you see in ticket #45. This would be used to implement --cheaper mode (a more advanced variant of --cheap where only the minimum amount of worker will be spawned). This is a work in progress, but probably will go in 0.9.9 too as the demand for --cheaper is fastly increasing and i suppose 1.0 will not be out before december. By the way, this value will go in uwsgi.workers() dictionary -- Roberto De Ioris http://unbit.it _______________________________________________ uWSGI mailing list [email protected] http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
