On 11/20/2011 10:55 AM, Roberto De Ioris wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Just out of curiousity. There not really a practical usecase for it. >> >> I have a poject with nginx / uwsgi / django >> >> Sometimes I'd like to run tests or demos on a windows host. >> > > Sadly, without sponsorship (read: money) would be impossibile to make such > a big work (i suppose at least 25% of the code must be adapted or totally > reimplementd for the win32 api). In addition to this uWSGI make an extreme > use of fork() copy on write. How to deal with this ?
Thanks. Well I think I will go for nginx (cygwin) / fastcgi / django then This is probably as close as I can get on a windows platform. In any case this is just for some demos / tests. I just wanted to be sure, that there is really no low feature, low performance, but protocol complient uwsgi implementation. just allowing me to start up a django app without any uwsgi specific calls and with only one worker. before creating another nginx setup and looking at fastcgi _______________________________________________ uWSGI mailing list [email protected] http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
