> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 3:58 PM, luigi scarso <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Roberto De Ioris <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> Just released a -rc4 (-rc3 was broken too) fixing a coupe of bugs in
>>> reloading.
>>>
>>> This release includes the mule farming support (documentation and
>>> example will be available soon) allowing "grouping"
>>> of mules.
>> giusto per rimanare in tema
>> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.lua.general/86202
>> [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (rc5) now available
>>
>> Ed anche per loro sospetto qualche intercolamento con le
>> release...sarà il periodo.
>>
>> A proposito: uwsgi supporterà lua 5.2.0 oppure rimarrà alla 5.1.4
>> Te lo chiedo perché mike pall sembra critichi la 5.2.0
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.lua.general/70563/match=vista
> uhu... sorry, it was intended as a private message.
> Anyway nothing so secret: I was expressing an absolutely personal idea
> about ''high'' rc numbers (more than 3, let's to say)
> and asked about the support of Lua 5.2.0 on uwsgi (Mike Pall expressed
> his opinion in
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.lua.general/70563/match=vista )
>
>


-rc numbers for 1.0 got completely out of control (and i fear another one
will be released including latest ruby fixes)

For the next trees i will start releasing rc's only a month before the
schedule, but i will start (just after 1.0) to release "snapshots"
regularly.

Regarding Lua 5.2 i still have not looked at it :(

-- 
Roberto De Ioris
http://unbit.it
_______________________________________________
uWSGI mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi

Reply via email to