> Il 29/12/11 09.52, Stefano Fontanelli ha scritto: >> We solved this issue using post-processing, as described in the >> thread: http://lists.unbit.it/pipermail/uwsgi/2011-September/002556.html > > I'm sorry. I made a mistake. > We solved the issue using post-buffering = 1. > >
That's too heavy, use post-buffering = 1024 this is the safest choice for WebOB (higher values could still lead to the same problem, but will be fixed post 1.0) -- Roberto De Ioris http://unbit.it _______________________________________________ uWSGI mailing list [email protected] http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
