> I have a question about which apache module to use. I have a setup with > a relatively small number of uwsgi processes that will be controlled by > an emperor. I would like to have apache handle the SSL component of > each request, but forward every valid request to the emperor. The > emperor can then route each request to the correct vassal. If this is > important, all uwsgi processes will have the same non-root username and > group. > > If any of the three apache modules will work fine, which module is > expected to have long term support? > > Thanks, > > Jeff Van Voorst >
Hi Jeff, currently mod_uwsgi is in good shape and pretty solid (but ugly as the death). The next bet is mod_proxy_uwsgi. It will be fully apache-compliant with node-monitoring and all those funny things recent apache releases have added. I think it will exit from beta-quality during july. After that i would like to propose it to the apache foundation (as they have already added mod_proxy_fastcgi and mod_proxy_scgi) -- Roberto De Ioris http://unbit.it _______________________________________________ uWSGI mailing list [email protected] http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
