>
>
> hmm yes, that would work i think, and gives me another idea too, thanks!
>
> so, i take it there is no generic/standard way to broadcast to the
> workers ... could there be? :-)  i actually kind of like the
> rpc/signal/(shmem|cache|...) method but it would be ideal if fewer
> steps were needed.


currently i see no easy way to implement it (using standard tcp sockets).
Wrapping via something like zeromq should simplify things, but maybe using
something like redis in publish/subscribe mode should be easier.

>
> aside ... are shared-sockets still only accepted by one process at a
> time?  is there an established way to map a one-to-many connection?

Only one process can accept() on a socket, maybe you could make some trick
with multicast packets but i do not know if it is a viable solution for
you.

-- 
Roberto De Ioris
http://unbit.it
_______________________________________________
uWSGI mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi

Reply via email to