On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Łukasz Mierzwa <[email protected]>wrote:

> 2012/10/16 Samuel <[email protected]>:
> > max-requests = 3000
>
> 3000 seems low, if You have high request rate than workers might be
> reloading too often (and You don't want constant reload during busy
> hours), set it to 100000 for example. Best value would be the one that
> will reload workers every 30 minutes (or something like that) at most.
> Keep in mind that max-requests is there to protect You from memory
> leaks, --reload-on-rss might be better alternative here.
>
Thanks I'll change this to check if any performance improvement.


>
> > #set socket listen queue to <n> (default 100, maximum is system
> dependent)
> > listen = 4000
> > socket = :8081
> > socket = :8082
> > socket = :8084
> > socket = :8083
> > socket = :8085
> >
> > map-socket = 0:1,2,3,4,5
> > map-socket = 1:6,7,8,9,10
> > map-socket = 2:11,12,13,14,15
> > map-socket = 3:16,17,18,19,20
> > map-socket = 4:21,22,23,24,25
>
> Does this socket magic offers real performance gains?
> --
>

I don't know actually. if not this mapping, any other suggestions?

> Łukasz Mierzwa
> _______________________________________________
> uWSGI mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
>



-- 
*吴焱红(Samuel)*

博客: blog.shanbay.com
微博: 扇贝网 <http://www.weibo.com/shanbay>
人人网: 一起背单词公共主页 <http://page.renren.com/699128841?ref=lnkprofile>
_______________________________________________
uWSGI mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi

Reply via email to