Il giorno 22/ott/2012, alle ore 16:14, Andrew Fischer <[email protected]> ha 
scritto:

> I've been running uwsgi for about a year and I've run into a situation
> that I can't seem to sort out. I'm not positive there is a good
> solution, but maybe someone with far more knowledge than I could shed
> some light. I'll give some background, please bear with me.
> 
> I run uwsig behind nginx to run a simple mercurial hgweb server. My
> uwsgi configuration is pretty basic:
> 
> "-M -p 4 -d /var/log/$daemon_name.log --pidfile /run/$daemon_name.pid
> --pythonpath $hgwebpath --module $hgwebmodule"
> 
> However, I recently added buildbot to our setup, which is triggered by
> a commit hook in hgweb. It's all built in stuff, I didn't write any of
> it.
> 
> Unfortunately this hook uses fork, and so generates defunct uwsgi
> instances when it occurs. It appears to be a known issue with the
> buildbot.
> 
> I decided uwsgi's --reaper option looked like it might help me out. It
> did the trick, very handy since I didn't want to wade into the
> buildbot codebase. Like the manual for --reaper says "you should fix
> your process spawning usage (if you can) ..." and I don't think I can.
> 
> However, after enabling reaper I noticed that very large commit pushes
> to hgweb over http would cause the process to be killed. It would
> happen anytime a push of 20MB or larger was pushed up to the server.
> (This is extremely rare, we just happen to have a project that carries
> this much baggage).


Do you get some c traceback or specific loglines when the worker dies ?


--
Roberto De Ioris
http://unbit.it
JID: [email protected]

_______________________________________________
uWSGI mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi

Reply via email to