Sounds reasonable, it make sense give nginx priority as you supposed. Andriy
---------------------------------------- > Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 14:50:47 +0800 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [uWSGI] uWSG and nice priority > > Hi, > > I have monit and chef client. I have those set to 2. I have nginx > and uwsgi set to -1. Maybee ngnx to -2? > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Andriy Kornatskyy > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > David, > > > > The question is generally about contention between various processes and > > how kernel schedule them. Giving nginx priority over uwsgi should be > > sufficient in most cases. > > > > What other `essential` processes besides nginx and uwsgi are on box? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Andriy Kornatskyy > > > > > > ---------------------------------------- > >> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 10:34:25 +0800 > >> From: [email protected] > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: [uWSGI] uWSG and nice priority > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> My nginx has a nice priority of -1. I just noticed that uWSGI when I > >> bootstrap my servers start with a nice of 2. What are the optimal > >> nice priority for a dedicated nginx and uWSGI server? I am using > >> Ubuntu 64. > >> > >> Thanks > >> _______________________________________________ > >> uWSGI mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi > > > > _______________________________________________ > > uWSGI mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi > _______________________________________________ > uWSGI mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi _______________________________________________ uWSGI mailing list [email protected] http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
