Thanks a lot. uWSGI never cease to amaze me!
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Roberto De Ioris <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks, > > > > For mules, is its stability and availability as good as uWSGI itself? > > > > Could a mule process be easily destroyed or recycled? > > > they are like standard workers, so if they die they will be respawned. > > You can even set harakiri for them if you need it. > > The only "not-well-tested" part is the "farming" concept (multiple mules > grouped), but i do not think you need it. > > > -- > Roberto De Ioris > http://unbit.it > _______________________________________________ > uWSGI mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi >
_______________________________________________ uWSGI mailing list [email protected] http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
