>>> Now my question is, what would be a more proper way to run these >>> workers, so that they are started and stopped with the uWSGI >>> application, and restarted if they crash, considering they are all >>> endless loops. > >> >> use muleloop(n) instead of mulefunc(n). >> >> The second one is used to call a function in a worker and run it in a >> mule, while the second is exactly what you need. > > but this again doesn't restart the mule and the job if it dies.
Are you sure the master is enabled ? mules are monitored like the other processes. Can you report what uWSGI says when a mule dies ? -- Roberto De Ioris http://unbit.it _______________________________________________ uWSGI mailing list [email protected] http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
