> On 21 January 2013 17:01, Łukasz Mierzwa <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2013/1/21 demerphq <[email protected]> >>> >>> FWIW, I share your general distaste that this is necessary, but in at >>> least of couple of cases I am aware of it really is a good option. >> >> >> It doesn't break anything and it adds a feature that peoples find >> useful. >> Being pragmatic works better than being tasteful. > > Indeed. I agree. Thanks again. > > Cheers, > Yves > > >
Just to announce that both uWSGI 1.4 (the tree on github) and 1.5 have the --thunder-lock option to force an "apache style" accept() usage. It is strongly advised to use that ONLY if you know what you are doing and ONLY on linux as its robust locking system looks the most (only ?) reliable one. -- Roberto De Ioris http://unbit.it _______________________________________________ uWSGI mailing list [email protected] http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
