Hey Roberto. This looks like a really super addition to uwsgi. I am not a go developer at this point but have started working on a go project.
The fact that I can leverage my existing experience working with uwsgi makes me feel a bit more confident. Thanks for the new additions. I am looking forward to working with it in the days to come. Kind Regards. On May 9, 2013 2:06 PM, "Roberto De Ioris" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, as many of you already know the current "go" plugin will be put "on > hold" > until the official go distribution will be more "embeddable" > > From now on the "gccgo" plugin will be the officially blessed way to run > uWSGI apps developed with go. > > The new plugin is a lot more uWSGI-friendly than the old one. > > The most interesting thing is that you do not need anymore to rebuild the > whole server. Your app will be compiled as a shared library you can load > in the server core. > > The plugin has been tested with gcc-4.7 and gcc-4.8 > > Steps: > > CFLAGS=-g UWSGI_PROFILE=gccgo make > > (-g is required since gcc 4.8) > > will build a monolithic uWSGI with the gccgo plugin in it. > > In addition to this a uwsgi.gox file is generated allowing your apps to > import the "virtual" "uwsgi" module. Copy this file where you want and > build your first app as shared library: > > gccgo -shared -fPIC -o myapp.so -Idir_of_uwsgi.gox t/go/uploadtest.go -lgcc > > (set dir_of_uwsgi.gox to the directory in which you have copied the gox > file, you can put it where the other gox files are, in such a case -I is > not needed) > > Now run the app: > > ./uwsgi --http-socket :9090 --http-socket-modifier1 11 --go-load ./prova.so > > the --go-load load a library in the process address space (you can call it > multiple times if needed) > > Now go to the /view url and check if the upload test is working. > > The uWSGI api has been not exposed (i will work on it soon). > > All of the uWSGI features work (included setting process names). > > Dinamically setting go arguments will be added in the next few days > > Performance looks the same (the new plugin is a bit faster as there are > less translations than before thanks to the 1:1 mappings of gccgo with c) > > Go developers, let me know what you think about it :) > > -- > Roberto De Ioris > http://unbit.it > _______________________________________________ > uWSGI mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi >
_______________________________________________ uWSGI mailing list [email protected] http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
