> Howdy, > > > > Hmm, so it sounds like the only real way is to have uWSGI do it; or beat > on the log once on the hard drive. Having a logstash format on uWSGI > would be awesome. :) > > Thanks! > -Jason
AFAIK there is no "logstash" format. It expects some kind of key-value object, so the upcoming log-encoder should be more than enough. As the only encoder i plan to release in 1.9.16 is the msgpack and logstash supports it i suppose you only need to choose the transport (udp, tcp, zeromq, rsyslog...) am i right ? -- Roberto De Ioris http://unbit.it _______________________________________________ uWSGI mailing list [email protected] http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
