A question, because I'm curious: did you consider using LGPLv2? I believe in essence this is the same. Of course I am not a license expert, or lawyer, or anything even close.
Cheers On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 12:42:45PM +0200, Roberto De Ioris wrote: > > Hi everyone, the uWSGI license (for both 1.4 and 1.9) has been updated to > > GPL2 + linking exception > > instead of GPL2 > > this should solve any issue when linking non-gpl compatible libraries and > when using libuwsgi.so in commercial products. > > The spirit of the uWSGI licensing should be now more straight: > > """ > unless you modify it and you do not want to release the patches to the > world, you are free to use it in the way you want > """ > > -- > Roberto De Ioris > http://unbit.it > _______________________________________________ > uWSGI mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi -- ~kad
pgp0a0LeyLIpD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ uWSGI mailing list [email protected] http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
