> On 26.03.2014 17:55, Roberto De Ioris wrote: >> >>> Roberto, it would be great to get some input from you when you've got a >>> minute on how hard it would be to implement a solution similar to what >>> Aarni outlined above. >>> >>> >>> Best, >>> Vladislav >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >> Hi, i have just pushed this patch to the build system: >> >> https://github.com/unbit/uwsgi/commit/8a8d2f867578ccd41f5702e444fd72f4dc9e1602 >> >> >> Regarding Aarni proposal i think it could be viable, i will push >> something >> in the next few hours >> > Okay, just took a look at your change, seems that will fix my problem, > trying it out. > > Let me know when the feature is in so I can test and report back. > > >
Sorry, completely forgot we already have this feature, thanks to the '@' technique: [uwsgi] foo = @(sym://foobar) bar = @(data://0) test = @(http://example.com/something) test2 = @(fd://3) and so on, all of the scheme are supported: https://github.com/unbit/uwsgi/blob/master/core/io.c#L1243 -- Roberto De Ioris http://unbit.it _______________________________________________ uWSGI mailing list [email protected] http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
