> A pretty easy move you say? So how would we get uwsgi to start a > container for each vassal worker?
Sorry, i was referring to the chroot/bindmounts procedure, managing docker instances with the Emperor is possible using the --emperor-proxy trick, but i find it really ugly (basically the vassal first calls docker run and then the docker instances reconnect-back to the Emperor). Honestly i have still not found an elegant way to integrate both, this is why (as we already have the namespace/cgroup integration implemented) we choose (for now) to invest on dockstrap and directly use docker images (and stop building our own images that is a really annoying and error-prone task) -- Roberto De Ioris http://unbit.it _______________________________________________ uWSGI mailing list [email protected] http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
