> On 2016-06-06 21:16, Roberto De Ioris wrote:
>
>> this (iirc) should be already improved in 2.1, but in the stable
>> branch,
>> adding "use Devel::Stacktrace" is the best approach (unless you want to
>> disable completely devel-stacktrace)
>
> Sorry, I didn't get it completely - what exactly is improved - behavior
> of postfork()/atexit()
> on mules or Devel::StackTrace issue?

hi, the Devel::StackTrace issue

>
> The primary problem is that postfork()/atexit() (defined in app) are
> called in named mule - is this normal?
>

yes, it is expected, this is why i suggested you to add a uwsgi::worker_id
check in your hook (sorry if i was not clear enough)

-- 
Roberto De Ioris
http://unbit.com
_______________________________________________
uWSGI mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi

Reply via email to