Hello,
i've just found that workers executing cron jobs respects the harakiri
parameter. Looking at the code for a way to workaround that I was wondering if
cron-harakiri shouldn't have precedence over the generic harakiri as patch below.
Also would using -1 a cron-harakiri (after the patch) let the workers runs
forever?
--- a/core/cron.c
+++ b/core/cron.c
@@ -172,7 +172,10 @@ void uwsgi_opt_add_cron2(char *opt, char *value, void
*foobar) {
if (c_unique)
uc->unique = atoi(c_unique);
- if (c_harakiri) {
+ if (uwsgi.cron_harakiri) {
+ uc->harakiri = uwsgi.cron_harakiri;
+ }
+ else if (c_harakiri) {
if (atoi(c_harakiri)) {
// harakiri > 0
uc->mercy = atoi(c_harakiri);
@@ -182,9 +185,6 @@ void uwsgi_opt_add_cron2(char *opt, char *value, void
*foobar) {
uc->mercy = -1;
}
}
- else if (uwsgi.cron_harakiri) {
- uc->harakiri = uwsgi.cron_harakiri;
- }
}
thanks
--
Riccardo Magliocchetti
@rmistaken
http://menodizero.it
_______________________________________________
uWSGI mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
