Really appreciate your info. After your program shows RPM right on the money
I'm not about to question the HP figures. I can also promises 90 rear wheel
does not exited me other than thinking how much better it would run at sea
level. Blower, turbo and the bottle?!?! Gonna try a pipe, try and get the
intake opened up and jetting. Gee maybe I can get up to 100 HP! Wonder if
any LOW LANDERS will be impressed. thanks again . BRUCE
----- Original Message -----
From: "TC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "V-MAX TECH LIST" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2000 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: top speed f/u
> Bruce,
> One other thing .. for what it is worth ... I used the ET sheet to see
> how much RWHP you would have at that altitude.
>
> Punching in a corrected Dyno RWHP value of 110, 4400 feet elevation,
> and 70 degrees temp ... it shows you would actually have 90 RWHP ....
> and at 90 degrees you slide down to 85.8 ..........
>
> The same bike, (pulling a corrected 110 RWHP on the dyno), running in
> Phoenix at 1150 feet elevation and with a 70 degree temp would be
> making 103 (real) RWHP ......
>
> I guess if you are going to live in the alps ... you need a
> supercharger, turbo or a bottle ...... (of course everyone else is in
> the same boat) .......
> campbell
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bruce Maycock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: top speed f/u
>
>
> > Was able to get out and get a better idea of the RPM at max speed.
> 135 is it
> > for mph in 4th gear. 5th gear will hold the same speed it does not
> increase
> > though.
> > snip <
>
>
> .............................................
> To unsubscribe go to http://www.sayegh.org/unsubscribe.htm
> .............................................
.............................................
To unsubscribe go to http://www.sayegh.org/unsubscribe.htm
.............................................
