El 6/20/07 6:31 PM, "Lex Spoon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Well, they are supposed to be "universally unique", right? So the
> more uniqueness, the better!
>
> Seriously, it sounds like Monticello would be better off using the
> name of the package as the identifier, instead of a generated random
> number or whatever it uses. In this case, "Etoys" would seem to make
> a great identifier.
>
> Maybe it is not even too late. Could the tools simply detect that the
> packages are using generated uuid's, and then guess a "uuid" by
> looking at the filename? E.g., for a file named "Etoys-edc.23",
> quietly treating the uuid as "Etoys"?
My hack, refined by Mathieu , solve this.
But some don't like it.
Edgar
_______________________________________________
V3dot10 mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/v3dot10
