El 8/6/07 5:51 PM, "Lex Spoon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Keith Hodges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You just dont seem to get it, I am not in a perfect world I want to
>> make things workable UNTIL these other good things of which you speak
>> happen. If you can do this visibly it provides the feedback to the
>> community as to what needs to change.
>
> Where did you get that idea? Package universes is already up and
> running, and has been for years, so it most certainly works with how
> things are now.
>
>
>
>> If I fork I end up managing their project
>> also, I cant track their changes without a lot of effort. I am already
>> doing this on about 15 packages, it is wearing me out, why do you
>> think I am so frustrated.
>
> Really! What 15 packages would that be? Have you submitted your
> patches to the maintainers?!
>
>
>
>> I saw a solution to this problem and I cant
>> get it... without forking universes also, which I am not going to do!
>
> If you patch 15 packages, then isn't that pretty much a fork?
> Assuming it is really what you want, you should probably set up your
> own universe server. It is easy to do -- it's all pure Squeak.
> Instructions are at the bottom of this page:
>
> http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/3785
>
>
> I must say, though, it sounds weird that you have so many local,
> non-standard patches. I believe you will have a much happier
> Squeaking experience if you can find a way to use the standard
> versions. If you use non-standard versions, then won't you have a
> hard time sharing your code with other people?
>
>
>
> Lex
I warn several times to Keith to play in teams.
Seems he end re-writing his own Squeak, being incompatible with existent
code and blame us.
He sure have good intentions, but the road to hell is made with good
intentions stones.
Edgar
_______________________________________________
V3dot10 mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/v3dot10
