12 Aug 2007 14:54:09 -0400, Lex Spoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > "Damien Cassou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > 07 Aug 2007 10:18:15 -0400, Lex Spoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > 1. Which of these versions can be loaded simultaneously? If they > > > have overlapping class names, then they need to be marked as > > > conflicting, something that is not even supported in package > > > universes right now. > > > > Monticello2 is completely independent and can be loaded without > > conflicts. It's unfinished however. > > > Excellent. > > What about Monticello15? Is that a non-reversible load? > > Also, what is the deal with the "Monticello bootstrap" entry? Is that > code that should be included in the base of 3.10, or what? For that > matter, is 1.5 really something that should be an independent package, > or is it mature enough to make the standard version for 3.10 ? > > All of this needs to be sorted out for the 3.10 release. It will be a > real mess if some packages require one version of Monticello while > others require a different, incompatible version of it. > > > It would be great if someone were to do some actual testing so we > could see where we are. It would be very helpful to know how many of > the development-universe packages are loadable under each of the four > different Monticello options.
Monticello2 can't load anything but MC2 packages. -- Damien Cassou _______________________________________________ V3dot10 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/v3dot10
