El 8/17/07 11:38 AM, "Lex Spoon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On the process issues, let me just repeat that I fully agree, Edgar.
> Please integrate submissions at the speed and in the order that makes
> sense, and please request anything reasonable from the submittors and
> the group at large that will help. If you want things on Mantis, or
> on the wiki, or if you want more input of some kind, then just ask.
> You guys are doing an extraordinarily good service to make the
> decisions about what goes in without upsetting too many of the people
> trying to use Squeak.
>
> On package loaders, it is important to have at least one major format
> that a distribution can be built around. I would prefer that the
> release team oversees this decision, just like it decides which
> compiler is standard. So I do not like this suggestion that the core
> image might dump Monticello and leave it up to each Squeak user to
> figure out which variant of which fork to use.
>
>
> If that happens, then maybe we need to build some kind of
> Monticello Team to maintain a main, non-controversial version
> of Monticello that most people can use. Such a team could run a bug
> and submission tracker much like we do for the core image.
>
> Such a Monticello Team would be an example of the cross-dialect
> packages Andreas asked about a few weeks ago....
>
>
> -Lex
I agree with the Monticello Team idea.
We need this current technology as standard and powerful as possible.
If a Monticello Team comes all gain.
And I test all they made and try to get in the base image.
Only I wish Avi or Colin or any of Impara people in this team.
Currently Mantis reports was assigned to Avi.
Edgar
_______________________________________________
V3dot10 mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/v3dot10
