On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:52:46 +0200, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:
El 9/23/07 5:53 AM, "Andreas Raab" escribió:
Why is that? I don't think it's a particularly smart idea to remove SM
from the image - there is a lot of useful code on SM and it would be a
shame if people didn't have access to it (in particular considering that
universes are only accessible via Squeak - e.g., you can't ask Google to
find a package in Universes but Google will turn up packages available
on SM).
Cheers,
- Andreas
We wish go to smaller images or not ?
If we wish a kernel , like Pavel have or a MinimalMorphic image, a lot
should go out.
I don't say SqueakMap is not useful !
Contrary, I think is a great thing to have.
But always people could load later.
Same for all packages now on Universes and some time ago in base image.
I toying with smaller linux distro now.
I falling in love with some like http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/ and
http://www.slax.org/
I think we could learn some...
A complete Linux + Squeak in 64 Mb business card should be a goal, like
SqueakNOS and SqueakWare.
s/should/is/ for the marketing people (perhaps in a form so that not an
expert must do it, other than giving advice :)
Cheers
Klaus
Cheers
_______________________________________________
V3dot10 mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/v3dot10
