On Dec 15, 2007 9:17 AM, Keith Hodges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am giving you the detail
It is not the right kind of detail. You should give an example of an expression that works before 7156 but does not work after. Or give an expression that ran faster before than after, along with the times on your machine. I understand what you have said. I could go and read the various issues and the code that comes with them and eventually figure out what you are talking about. However, I don't have time to do that today. So, I want you to make it easy for people to see what you are talking about without even having to read the code. Sure, I'm lazy, but other people are, too. You need to give enough detail that even lazy people are convinced. >7156 has overwritten the implementation of #now with an old one. For all I know, the old one was correct. I'm not saying it is, I'm just saying I'd like more evidence that 7156 is wrong. -Ralph _______________________________________________ V3dot10 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/v3dot10
