Edgar, I thought we had agreed to two separate updates to cover this issue:
May 10 08:49:35 <kencausey> OK let's compromise May 10 08:49:50 <kencausey> I think it's kind of pointless, but let's do 2 updates May 10 08:49:58 <kencausey> Both of them update the version, and both ask the user first May 10 08:50:04 <kencausey> The first one updates it to 3.10 May 10 08:50:08 <kencausey> The second to 3.10.1g May 10 08:50:48 <kencausey> By the way, I say we just jump to gamma and skip alpha and beta because of the short schedule and we really should not do anything that we would not normally do during a gama May 10 08:50:52 <kencausey> err gamma May 10 08:51:30 <edgardec> kencausey, Ok, two updates like in 3.8 May 10 08:51:44 <edgardec> but with warning as 7068 May 10 08:51:49 <kencausey> edgardec: Yes, sounds good. To reiterate: The first update would ask the user if she wanted to update the system version information in her image to reflect the fact that it was in fact 3.10 and not 3.10beta which it says as of the released image. My reasoning to ask the user and not just do it is that it is at least concievable that she has code that relies on SystemVersion (wrong or not) and so silently changing it on her would not be nice. Then the second update would similarly ask the user if she wished to update her image and move it to 3.10.1gamma and get updates intended for that release. My understanding of 7160 is that either it changes the SystemVersion to 3.10 or it changes it to 3.10.1. Is the user given a third choice of doing neither? As far as I can tell (I've not actually tested it) she is not. Secondly it should not be changed to 3.10.1 yet because there is no such completed release. Changes to 'final' versions should be done as the last task before issuing a release. Also it doesn't appear that you are updating the #7035 bug report to reflect your work/progress on this issue. You should have assigned the issue to yourself and then added at least a note and adjusted the status. Ken
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ V3dot10 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/v3dot10
