http://codereview.chromium.org/20533/diff/4/1003 File src/codegen-arm.cc (right):
http://codereview.chromium.org/20533/diff/4/1003#newcode1573 Line 1573: ASSERT(!has_valid_frame() || frame_->height() == original_height); On 2009/02/20 13:06:20, William Hesse wrote: > How could there not be a valid frame here, if the function is called with a > valid frame? Doesn't control flow have to exit the switch statement at the end? If the last case we compile returns and none of the other ones break, then there is no frame at the end. http://codereview.chromium.org/20533 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ v8-dev mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
