Understandable, but still kinda disappointing. Considering you have more experience with this codebase than me, do you have any suggestions for SoC-sized projects? In the next five months, what's the roadmap for v8?
Thanks. On Mar 30, 12:16 am, Mads Sig Ager <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mike, > > currently, we are not working on implementing E4X and we are not > planning to any time soon. We are compatible with WebKit/JSC, and we > want that to continue. The reason for this is that the web programmer > should not have yet another platform to worry about. > > -- Mads > > > > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Mike Douglas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I wondering, does the v8 team have an opinion on E4X? There is an open > > ticket on the website, but a message in v8-dev from October mentioned > > that no one was working on it. Kevin Millikin mentioned in a QA[1] > > that you were focusing on ECMA-262 + whatever extensions SquirrelFish > > supported. Are you still tied, feature-wise, to WebKit? > > > Assuming you're interested, would this make a good Summer of Code > > project? Is anyone interested in possibly mentoring? > > > Thanks. > > > -- > > [1]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZnaaUoHPhs --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ v8-dev mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
