On 2009/03/30 09:51:36, Kevin Millikin wrote: > You may want to consider doing something with the other constructor (copying an > existing frame) as well. I suspect it gets hit a lot more than this one and it > currently doesn't leave any slop for the expression stack to grow.
> You should also make a corresponding change on ARM. Done. The copy constructor uses elements->capacity(), and ARM has identical changes. http://codereview.chromium.org/57006 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ v8-dev mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
