http://codereview.chromium.org/140068/diff/1007/14
File src/x64/ic-x64.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/140068/diff/1007/14#newcode188
Line 188: //  -- rsp[4] : receiver
On 2009/06/22 19:14:23, William Hesse wrote:
> rsp[8]?

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/140068/diff/1007/15
File src/x64/register-allocator-x64.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/140068/diff/1007/15#newcode50
Line 50: RelocInfo::NONE);
On 2009/06/22 19:14:23, William Hesse wrote:
> Could you say
> CodeGeneratorScope::Current()->masm()->Move(fresh.reg(), handle()), or
is there
> no way to access the masm?



Done.  And also done for the same piece of code below.

http://codereview.chromium.org/140068/diff/1007/13
File src/x64/virtual-frame-x64.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/140068/diff/1007/13#newcode862
Line 862: // expects name in ecx, value in eax, and receiver on the
stack.  It
On 2009/06/22 19:14:23, William Hesse wrote:
> rcx, value in rax,

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/140068/diff/1007/13#newcode874
Line 874: // Register eax is free for value, which frees ecx for name.
On 2009/06/22 19:14:23, William Hesse wrote:
> Register rax ... rcx

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/140068/diff/1007/13#newcode879
Line 879: // Register ecx is free for name, which guarantees eax is free
for
On 2009/06/22 19:14:23, William Hesse wrote:
> rcx ... rax

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/140068

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to